Give us a little more information and we'll give you a lot more relevant content
Your child's birthday or due date
Girl Boy Other Not Sure
Add A Child
Remove A Child
I don't have kids
Thanks For Subscribing!
Oops! Something went wrong. Please contact

5 Myths About Baby Formula and ‘Formula Babies’ Parents Should Ignore

Yes, breast is best, but that does not mean formula is bad. Many parents should stop giving formula feeders the side eye.

Baby formula has a bad rep. Part of that is because the motto “Breast Is Best” has been inked indelibly on to a flabby body of research in hope of supporting woefully unsupported breastfeeding mothers. However, the unintended consequence of pushing breast milk is the deep shame felt by those families with formula-fed babies, who for whatever reason — be it a medical necessity or social barriers — give their babies formula in lieu of breast milk. Is formula bad for babies? No, of course not. And as such, “no family should ever feel guilty or ashamed for formula feeding,” says Dr. Steven Abrams, chairperson of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. “That serves no purpose and is not consistent with what we know about feeding babies.”

Baby formula has become the shadowy villain of infancy largely due to pernicious myths. The truth is that formula is far more benign than its contemporary reputation suggests. Here are some of the misconceptions that need to go away.

Baby Formula Myth #1: Formula Is Nutritionally Inferior to Breastmilk

There are differences between breast milk and formula. However, those have little to do with a child getting the appropriate amount of nutrition. The protein, energy, vitamins and mineral content of formulas has been closely regulated since the 1980s. Any formula sold is required to meet the same nutritional requirements to meet the needs of growing babies.

Fatherly IQ
  1. What is your biggest fear related to the coronavirus pandemic?
    Given mortality rates, I'm scared my parents will die.
    Given what we don't know, I'm scared my kids will get sick.
    Given the economic situation, I'm scared of the financial damage.
    Given the news, I'm scared I'll continue to be cooped up with family.
Thanks for the feedback!
Oops! Something went wrong. Please contact

“Modern formulas are designed to ensure adequate growth,” Abrams explains. “There isn’t a concern about that.” However, there is a concern about the baby receiving the immune support that breast milk provides. And this is one of the main reasons pediatricians say that breast milk is best for babies.

That said, the increased risk of communicable diseases, allergies or other medical conditions are small enough that, baby formula isn’t dangerous. “We live here in the United States where many of the conditions associated with immune problems are less common,” Abrams says. “Not breastfeeding is not ideal, but doesn’t fall anywhere near the parenting problem that not immunizing would be.”

Baby Formula Myth #2: Expensive Organic Formulas Are Closer to Breastmilk

Because all formula is tightly regulated by federal law, all formulas have to meet specific nutritional requirements. Formula makers, then, need to differentiate their products. This has given rise to organic, GMO-free formulas, and formulas supplemented with additives like supposedly brain-boosting DHA. All of these difference comes with a price, of course.

“For that reason, I tell people when picking a formula, routinely to pick the cheapest one,” Abrams explains. “Some of the things advertised in infant formula, I don’t think provide added value to families.”

However, Abrams notes that when parents do pick a formula that their baby enjoys, they should stick with it. Switching formulas frequently could cause issues for an infant who is already comfortable with the experience of a specific formula.

Baby Formula Myth #3: Formula-Fed Babies Don’t Bond as Much With Mothers

While it’s true that breastfed babies spend a great deal of time experiencing skin-to-skin contact with their mothers, that does not mean that formula-fed babies are somehow deficient in parental bonding. The idea originally surfaced from old studies suggesting long-term damage to the bonding relationship if a child was not held or breastfed within the first few hours of life.

“I don’t believe the current thinking supports that,” Abrams says. “This is a kind of mythology that needs to go away. I don’t think anyone would suggest that there’s scientific evidence that babies fed at the breast do not bond with mothers or fathers appropriately.”

In fact, there are plenty of times for mothers and fathers to bond with babies fed formula from the bottle. And there is simply no reason skin-to-skin contact can’t happen while bottle-feeding. Parents just need to get topless. You’re welcome.

Baby Formula Myth #4: Formula Leads to Obesity

This myth is a tricky one. There is some evidence linking formula to the risk of obesity in children, but it’s not due to anything that’s in the formula. Rather, it’s a parenting issue. It turns out that parents who formula feed might be overfeeding.

“Some of this can be limited in effect in being cautious about the overfeeding of babies,” Abrams says. “It’s not a given that a formula-fed baby will be obese.” Is there a concern? Sure, But much of that concern can be mitigated by careful feeding practices on the part of a parent and the watchful eye of a pediatrician.

Baby Formula Myth #5: Formula Is Never a Good Idea

There are times when formula feeding is important. Sometimes, a mother is simply unable to produce enough breast milk for an infant. Other times there could be health issues around infectious diseases like HIV. Some women are simply unable to breastfeed or find it too difficult due to surgeries, inverted nipples, pain or social issues that make breastfeeding or pumping a non-starter.

“Mothers should not be hesitant to formula-feed if that’s what their caregiver or pediatrician believes is best for the baby,” Abrams says. “It’s not even close to the end of the world.”